While it is still true that driving in a car is much safer now than it was decades ago, the high-water mark for automobile safety, at least in terms of the frequency of traffic deaths, was actually four years ago, back in 2014.

Since that time, several factors have been pulling the number of fatal car accidents , or at least the overall number of fatalities, up. One of these facts seems to be an epidemic in the number of deadly hit-and-run accidents.

Since 2012, the number of fatalities due to hit-and-run accidents has spiked by over one-third, from 1,512 deaths in 2012 to 2,046 deaths in 2016, the last year final statistics were available. Since, 2009, the number has actually increased by 60 percent, and it is now the highest it has ever been since 1975, when government agencies started to track these numbers.

Although one could rightly say that hit-and-run accidents are a nationwide problem, they are a particular problem in Nevada, where the rate of fatal hit-and-run accidents is over 2.0 per 100,000 residents. This ranks Nevada high among the states when it comes to the frequency of deadly hit-and-runs.

Why the number of these tragic hit-and-run accidents is on the increase puzzles experts, since there seems to be no real rhyme or reason to the trend. Some have speculated that distracted driving is to blame, while others think it might just be a consequence of urbanization, meaning cars, pedestrians and bicycles are sharing space in close quarters.

Whatever the reason, though, the families of victims will no doubt spend financial and emotional capital recovering from these sorts of tragedies. While no amount of money can bring a loved one back, there are legal options for recovering compensation even if the driver is never found.

We represent victims of other catastrophic injuries too
On Behalf of Bradley, Drendel & Jeanney • Nov 15, 2018
This blog has previously discussed how our law firm offers advice and representation to victims of spinal cord injuries. Whether these people suffer paralysis or, luckily, are still somewhat mobile, they will no doubt face a number of different profound challenges in their lives.

It is imperative that they get the financial compensation they need in order to pay for these costs and be able to heal fully. We see it as our job to make sure, insofar as possible, that our client gets all of the compensation to which he is legally entitled after a spinal cord injury.

To do less would mean that the victim, at some point down the road, is going to be in a state of financial hardship and, in all likelihood, physically unable to provide for himself.

However, we do not just represent victims of spinal cord injuries but also help those who have suffered a profound injury to another vital organ or organs. For instance, severe car accidents can also leave a person recovering from a traumatic brain injury. Like spinal cord injuries, the damage from a brain injury is permanent and can be profound.

Even a mild brain injury can affect one’s ability to retain and process information, and a major injury can leave the victim with mental deficits or, in the worst cases, in a persistent unconscious or semi-conscious state.

All of these types of injuries are complicated both from a medical and a legal standpoint, which is why so many clients have trusted their cases, and to some extent their futures, to our knowledge and experience. We will employ our proven skills to making sure that victims and their families are provided for financially after a serious accident.

Many people in Reno, Nevada probably recognize paralysis as a symptom of a serious injury to the spinal cord. The loss of mobility is indeed part and parcel of the vast majority of spinal cord injuries , and it alone can spell a lifetime of pain and suffering.

Additionally, someone who suffers from paralysis will need extensive medical treatment and rehabilitative care. Moreover, even after they are ready to go home, there is going to be a lot of cost associated with making the necessary adjustments to one’s life and daily living, adjustments which include, for instance, moving or making one’s home handicapped accessible.

However, there are other conditions associated with spinal cord injuries that make life even harder. For instance, even if someone is not paralyzed completely, he may lose control over when he goes to the bathroom. Likewise, one will lose the sensation of pain, meaning that it is easier to suffer from something like a burn or even a bedsore.

More seriously, a spinal cord injury can cause serious problems with one’s blood pressure that, if left untreated, can even lead to a premature death. Likewise, someone with a more serious injury to the spine may experience trouble with her breathing.

Finally, a spinal cord injury can impact one’s overall health. A victim may have difficulty with obtaining a balanced muscle tone, for instance, and the fact one cannot move, or has more difficulty doing so, can also mean that a once physically fit person gets out of shape. Not surprisingly, the victim of a spinal cord injury may also suffer from depression.

The bottom line is that paralysis is just one of many serious medical problems a victim of a spinal cord injury will face over his life. Fortunately, assuming the injury was caused by another person’s negligence, it is possible for a victim to get compensation for his losses.

A 17-year-old from nearby Sparks has died after being hit by a car. The girl was reportedly crossing a street near an area high school when the accident happened. The accident happened after dark, and it appeared from photos of the scene that it occurred at least in close proximity to a crosswalk.

Police said that the driver of the vehicle who struck her, also a teenager, stayed at the scene of the accident and spoke with police.

Police have at least initially ruled out drugs and alcohol as a factor in this crash, and they also indicated that they did not believe the driver was speeding. An investigation in to the cause of this tragic accident remains underway.

To the general public, it may be easier to excuse the driver who hit the girl since he probably was not being reckless. However, even if this was an accident, the reality is that a family has lost a child or sibling who was just entering into the prime of her life.

Even if this was an accident, the family still deserves some acknowledgement for their loss in the form of compensation from the responsible party. At a minimum, they should receive help paying for the victim’s final medical bills and funeral expenses.

Particularly when around an area where pedestrians frequent, such as high schools, drivers must remember that their obligations involve more than just driving soberly and with due regard for the speed limit. They must pay utmost attention to the road and must yield to pedestrians when they are lawfully crossing the street. If they fail in these obligations and cause a car accident involving a pedestrian, then in justice, they owe compensation to the family of the victim.

Nevada’s anti-phone law is strict, but is it effective?
On Behalf of Bradley, Drendel & Jeanney • Oct 26, 2018
Nevada is one of the stricter states when it comes to preventing distracted driving on account of phones. Like a minority fraction of other states, Nevada’s laws prohibit motorists from using handheld phones for any purpose while driving.

This law not only so-called texting and driving, which really includes about any smartphone use, it also prohibits making a traditional cellular phone call with a handheld phone. Those who choose to break these laws face the possibility of fines even when there has been no accident.

These sorts of laws have been hailed as effective at reducing the number of injuries and deaths on the roads, and, indeed, for good reason. However, looking at how Nevada fares compared to the other states with respect to distracted driving, there may be some question as to how effective Nevada’s laws have been to this point.

Nevada’s rate of distracted driving is a bit below the national average, with the average motorist being distracted anywhere between 14 and 16 percent of his total driving time. However, the fact that drivers in this state are not paying attention to the road about 15 percent of the time is quite frankly disturbing in of itself. Moreover, several nearby states, which also have complete bans on handheld phones, have better percentages.

In order to prevent serious car accidents , the state, the City of Reno, and the surrounding communities may need to step up enforcement of measures aimed to curb distracted driving. New laws and further penalties may also be needed. In any event, though, a Nevada victim of a distracted driver can and perhaps even should consider holding the driver accountable through the appropriate civil lawsuit.

Many people in the Reno area have probably heard that motorcyclists who wear helmets are making a valuable investment. Helmets do indeed save lives and prevent traumatic brain injuries. It is a good idea for a motorcyclist who wants to travel Nevada’s roads to wear one.

However, the research is a little less certain when it comes to whether helmets prevent spinal cord injuries and other injuries to the back and spine. On the one hand, one study tended to dispel the notion that helmets may actually increase the risk of spinal cord injuries because they add extra weight on to one’s head and thus increase the twisting force on the spine in an accident.

However, the study was not as crystal clear when it came to whether helmets actually reduced spinal cord injuries. There was some evidence that helmets prevented fractures and other injuries in the cervical vertebrae, that is, in one’s neck. However, with respect to other types of spinal cord injuries, the study showed helmets made no significant difference in frequency or severity.

It does bears repeating that helmets do not prevent all motorcycle injuries. One common misunderstanding some people may have is that if a motorcyclist gets seriously hurt in an accident and was not wearing a helmet, that somehow makes the accident the motorcyclist’s fault.

Such is simply not the case, as helmets really do nothing to stop motorcycle accidents; they merely prevent some types of injuries.

The best way other motorists can prevent motorcycle accidents is to follow the laws, pay careful attention to one’s driving and be courteous when one is near a motorcycle. When drivers fail to do this, it is ultimately their responsibility to pay for the damages they cause.

A victim of a drunk driving accident in Nevada may have to spend the rest of his or her life recovering from that one split second in which the victim’s car was hit by a vehicle driven by an intoxicated driver. They may, for instance, face paralysis because of a spinal cord injury or permanent brain damage after a head injury. In some cases, the victims may include the family members of a person who lost his or her life in a crash caused by a drunk driver.

While any bad car accident is hard to deal with emotionally, victims may have a lot of additional, and justifiable, anger at the person who caused the drunk driving accident. This is because while they may have not crashed their car intentionally, everyone knows by now that drunk or drugged driving is extremely dangerous behavior and can cause a severe collision.

This anger is not something to be ashamed of, as it is not really driven by a need for revenge. It is really a matter of justice that drunk and drugged drivers be held accountable for their actions. At a minimum, this would mean paying for the victim’s medical bills, lost wages and other non-economic losses, such as pain and suffering. However, in cases like these, it seems that perpetrators should pay additional damages just to reinforce that their behavior was completely unacceptable.

A previous post on this blog talked about how punitive damages may be available after Reno, Nevada, drunk driving accidents. Our law office is fully prepared to help victims of drunk or drugged drivers pursue these damages when they are available. We will investigate thoroughly, so we can reinforce to a judge, a jury or even a mediator how important it is that drunk drivers pay all damages for which they are legally responsible.

As this blog has discussed before, the victim of a car accident or other motor vehicle accident may be able to pursue compensation for their out-of-pocket losses as well as their non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. Ordinarily, it is appropriate for someone who caused an accident through human carelessness or oversight to pay for these damages. Sometimes, though, this just simply is not enough, because it does not reinforce how serious the misconduct of the person who caused the accident was.

For instance, drunk driving accidents really should never happen since, by now, anyone who gets behind a wheel knows how dangerous it is to do so while drunk. Someone who chooses to do so anyway is arguably more than just careless; that person has little regard for the safety and wellbeing of others.

Under Nevada law , punitive or exemplary damages may be sought following a drunk driving accident precisely because such accidents should never happen if a driver is being even remotely safety conscious. Punitive damages may be available following other traffic accidents as well. As the name implies, this extra compensation is not designed so much to cover a victim’s loss as it is to make an example out of or punish the person responsible for the accident for flagrantly poor choices.

Specifically, someone seeking out punitive damages has to show clearly and convincingly that the person who caused the accident did so either intentionally or with almost outright contempt for the rights of other people. Limits to how much one can get in punitive damages may apply, and victims should, on a more general note, discuss the possibility of obtaining punitive damages with their attorneys.

After meeting a victim and taking on their case, one of the steps a good commercial vehicle accident attorney may take is to start an independent investigation of the accident. Some people in Reno, Nevada, might see this as an unnecessary step, particularly if there is already a detailed police report on file.

However, it is important to remember that the police report is only one source of information when it comes to what caused a major truck accident. Other sources of information include photos or video from the scene of the accident, as well as results from on-site surveys.

Because police are primarily looking for evidence of a law violation when they respond to an accident, they might not investigate as thoroughly as one might think. For instance, they are not necessarily looking to determine the exact cause of the accident unless the result will determine whether or not the police will file charges.

On the other hand, an engineer or other expert who investigates the accident independently is going to look at the evidence carefully and apply the principles of math and physics to make a judgment on exactly what happened to cause an accident. Sometimes, these investigations may uncover facts and leads that the police simply missed, while in other cases, they can serve to clarify and amplify what already commonly accepted as the cause of the crash.

If they are blamed for an accident, truck companies and their insurers are often going to fight hard to avoid liability, or, at least reduce the degree of their responsibility. A good response on the part of a victim is to respond with a scientific and independent investigation in to the cause of the accident.

A wrong way crash on Interstate 80 left one person dead and another person seriously injured and having to be flown by helicopter to a nearby hospital. Sadly, this is not the first time this blog has reported on a recent wrong way accident in the Reno area.

Police say that they received reports of someone driving the wrong way on the interstate a few minutes before the crash occurred. They were not able to respond in time to prevent what some might have seen as inevitable car accident. The driver eventually struck another motorist who was traveling with the flow of traffic head on

The person who was driving the wrong way died in the crash. Another person, the driver of a Tahoe, suffered serious injuries and had to be life flighted from the scene to get immediate medical assistance. Authorities are still investigating the crash and have asked the public to come forward with any information they may have about it.

When people are involved in a car collision caused by a negligent driver who died in the crash, there might be some question as to whether they can still pursue claims for compensation. The answer to this question is often “yes,” but it may entail having to sue the estate of the driver in order to access any available insurance proceeds.

Other means of pursuing compensation may also be available to the injured driver. Drivers injured in wrong way crashes should consider evaluating legal options with the help of a personal injury attorney, as they will likely have substantial medical bills and may also be out of work for a long time.