Distracted driving a hard temptation to resist
On Behalf of Bradley, Drendel & Jeanney • Apr 04, 2019
According to the results of a recent study, many motorists in Reno find texting and driving, and other distracted driving habits, too alluring to quit. This is true despite the repeated warnings that such behavior can lead to serious and even fatal car accidents.

While this study was conducted by a major insurance company, the results were reported by at least one media outlet. In any event, the analysis of the results, which surveyed more than 2,000 drivers, should be a warning to everyone that we have a way to go when it comes to distracted driving.

The study found that, even in the face of laws prohibiting such behavior, about 44 percent of those surveyed admitted to texting and driving. Likewise, almost one in four people admitted that they had checked their social media accounts while driving. However, these classic distracted driving behaviors were not the only areas of concern. More than one in five people admitted to snapping a photo with their cellphones while driving.

Phones were not the only problem with respect to distracted driving. In fact, 80 percent of those surveyed admitted to trying to juggle food or drink while driving. Also, about one-third of those surveyed said that they had groomed themselves, doing things like brushing their teeth, while behind the wheel.

Perhaps the scariest thing about this research is that 13 percent of those studied candidly acknowledged that they would have a hard time quitting their texting and driving habit, even though the behavior is clearly dangerous. Judging by the results of this survey, further steps to prevent distracted driving are needed. In the meantime, it is important for victims of distracted drivers to remember that they have legal options available to them that can hold a distracted driver accountable for their injuries.

A 23-year-old died in a recent motorcycle crash in the Reno area. The man himself was a Reno resident.

The accident happened in the early evening hours and appears to have been at an intersection. A sport utility vehicle and the motorcyclist collided. Although authorities attempted to revive the motorcyclist, he was eventually declared dead at the scene.

Police say that they will continue to investigate the accident. At present, they had no indication as to whether drugs and alcohol were a contributing factor, but they did indicate that speeding may have played a role in the accident. The police did not, however, say which motorist had been speeding.

As this investigation continues, it is going to be important for the family of the motorcyclist to consider their legal options carefully. In particular, they need to be on the lookout for the possibility that there could be some prejudice, including on the part of the police, against the motorcyclist.

In some cases, people automatically assume that motorcyclists are at fault whenever there is a serious motorcycle accident. An independent investigation in to the circumstances may

After all, the family will likely need to evaluate their options for receiving compensation after this tragic accident. In addition to funeral expenses and other out-of-pocket costs, others may have been relying on this young man to contribute his income to the family. Additionally, the family of this man will likely experience a great deal of emotional distress and other loss that is hard to quantify but still very real.

A family who has lost a loved one in a motorcycle accident may wish to consult with an attorney to evaluate their legal options.

Like a growing minority of other states, Nevada allows its residents to use marijuana legally, even without a medical need, under certain circumstances. This law has been on the books since 2017 following a ballot measure. Obviously, this law was not intended to be a license for Nevada motorists to engage in drugged driving. Most people recognize that such behavior is just as dangerous as drunk driving.

Some studies suggest, however, that the mere liberalization of state laws about marijuana use can lead to an increase in drugged driving accidents. The studies surveyed a number of states that have legalized the drug and then compared them to other states where recreational marijuana use remains prohibited. The results were that collision-related insurance claims increased in those states that had legalized the drug.

Those who reported on the surveys observed that when a drug, like marijuana, is legal, more people use it. Thus, more people may choose to drive while under the influence of the drug. As driving high can be a lot like driving drunk, it is no surprise that the frequency of accidents increases as a result.

Others, however, have cautioned that marijuana can stay in a person’s system for a long time after they actually use the drug. There is no reliable way to scientifically measure how high a person is or, for that matter, how recently the person last used marijuana.

No matter how one feels about the drug, the bottom line is that people using it must do so without endangering the lives of others on the road. If a drugged driver does cause an accident while under the influence, they may have to pay compensation to their victims.

As this blog has discussed on previous occasions, victims of accidents who feel that an insurance company is acting unfairly when processing a claim, or who feels that the company is intentionally stalling in order to force a favorable settlement, may be able to raise a claim of bad faith against the insurance company.

Although they might both be thought of as bad faith claims in common parlance, Nevada actually offers two distinct options for hold insurance companies who behave unreasonably in the process of handling a claim.

For one, a person can accuse the company of violating a Nevada law that prohibits insurance companies from engaging in claim handling practices that are unfair to those whom insurance companies are supposed to serve or protect. Basically, provisions of this law prohibit insurance companies from unduly holding up a claim or otherwise flexing their muscle for their financial advantage.

If a company violates this law, then it can receive an administrative penalty. Additionally, if the violation actually caused the accident victim some sort of loss, then the victim can pursue compensation for that loss.

Depending on the circumstances , a person dealing with a stubborn insurance company may also raise a claim of bad faith against the company. As a word of warning, though, the fact that the company may have engaged in one or even several prohibited claim handling practice does not automatically mean the company is liable for bad faith. Additional proof may be required, and a person interested in pursuing a bad faith claim should therefore evaluate his or her options with an experienced attorney.

The official first day of spring will not arrive for another couple of weeks. Just the same, the weather starts to warm up in the Reno area in March and April, and that means that more motorcyclists in the area will be pulling their bikes out of their garages for a ride.

For drivers of other vehicles, this is a great time for a reminder that, as they travel along Nevada’s roads and highways, they need to be on the alert for motorcyclists. If they are not, they can cause serious motorcycle accidents that are relatively likely to leave the motorcyclist seriously injured or even dead.

According to recent research , drivers of other vehicles still need to be a better job of training themselves to be on the lookout for motorcyclists. In most cases, collisions between motorcycles and other vehicles happen because the driver of the other vehicle interferes with the motorcyclist’s right-of-way.

Motorcycles are naturally smaller and, thus, are easy to lose in a larger vehicle’s blind spots. Moreover, motorcyclists have to handle their vehicles differently than do the drivers of other vehicles. Many times, drivers just are not preparing for these differences when traveling behind or near a motorcycle. The ongoing problem in this country with distracted driving certainly is not helping matters in this respect.

Motorcyclists experience more than their share of fatal accidents. Although motorcycles account for less than 5 percent, or 1 in 20, of all vehicles registered in the country, as of 2016, motorcyclists accounted for 13 percent of all traffic-related deaths. It is imperative that drivers of other vehicles stay especially on alert for motorcyclists and take the appropriate steps to prevent accidents. If they fail to do so and cause an accident, they can be held financially accountable.

An accident on U.S. Highway 50 claimed the life of a Silver Springs, Nevada man recently. As many of our readers may know, Silver Springs is about 45 miles from Reno.

The Nevada Highway Patrol is investigating this accident and has asked for witnesses or those who have information about this accident to come forward. Officers indicated that they do think drugs or alcohol may have played a role in this tragic accident.

Police say that the driver of a sedan hit the front of a vehicle that was attempting to enter the highway at the point where it intersected with a local street. Drivers coming on to a highway are expected to yield to traffic that is already on the highway, but this driver, who was operating a Ford F-350 truck, did not do so.

Judging by the damage to the vehicles, the driver of the sedan did not have time even to slow down, much less stop, before hitting the truck once it pulled out unexpectedly. Both drivers were critically injured, but the operator of the sedan, who was a 40-year-old man, succumbed to his injuries shortly after arriving via helicopter at a nearby hospital.

While certainly there will be more investigation in to this crash, it looks as if it will go down as yet another deadly drunk driving accident in this state. This is hard to understand since, for decades now, law enforcement officers and others have repeatedly and sternly warned the public about the dangers of driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The family of the victim may be eligible to receive compensation from the at-fault driver, and this compensation could include punitive damages.

Most spinal cord injuries end in paralysis
On Behalf of Bradley, Drendel & Jeanney • Feb 28, 2019
Many people in the Reno area probably realize that permanent paralysis is a common symptom of a spinal cord injury, whether the injury comes from a car accident, a workplace fall or some other incident.

What people might not realize is how likely some degree of paralysis is once one’s spinal cord suffers an injury. Only a handful of spinal cord injuries , fewer than 1 in 100, end with a person not experiencing any paralysis at all.

On the other hand, 20 percent of those who suffered a spinal cord injury experience what is called complete paraplegia, or the complete loss of sensation and movement from the waist down. Over 13 percent of victims were completely paralyzed from the neck down, meaning that they require constant medical and personal care.

The remaining 2 out of 3 or so victims experience conditions called incomplete paraplegia or incomplete tetraplegia. In both of these cases, a victim will experience some, but not all, symptoms of paralysis.

How the condition affects a given person depends a lot on the nature of the injury to the spine. For instance, some victims may have sensation in the affected areas but be unable to move them, while others may be just the opposite. Among those with incomplete injuries, about 2 out 3 experience problems above their waist.

Any spinal cord injury is a very serious matter which will likely require an investment of a lot of time and money in to medical care, rehabilitation expenses and the like. Moreover, a Nevada resident who suffers a spinal cord injury may have to find a new career or figure out a way to support herself without being able to work.

It is important for any motorist to give plenty of space to the vehicles behind which they are traveling. In this respect, many drivers observe what often gets referred to as the two-second rule. In other words, when a car is following another car, it is best for the driver of the car behind to arrive at a designated landmark on the road, like a sign, at least two seconds after the preceding car passes it.

When it comes to motorcycles, though, the common wisdom is that a driver should give the motorcyclist some extra space. Specifically, many safety experts recommend giving a motorcyclist up to four seconds of following time.

While it might not be intuitive to those who do not ride motorcycles, there are actually several good reasons for this additional safety precaution. For one, motorcycles have a tendency to change speed and direction more rapidly than do other vehicles.

As an example, and particularly when a motorcyclist downshifts as opposed to hitting the brakes, a motorcycle may come to a stop with relatively little warning. Moreover, motorcycles may have more reasons to do so. For instance, slick roadways, obstacles or even a jagged surface on the road that a other drivers can largely ignore are serious hazards to a motorcyclist.

It is important for motorists in the Reno area to give motorcycles plenty of room when following them. Otherwise, drivers could cause serious rear-end motorcycle accidents. If they do cause an accident, then the motorcyclist or the surviving family, may be able to seek appropriate compensation for their losses. This compensation can cover expenses like medical bills and lost wages, as well as other damages.

People in the Reno area who take a few moments to look at a truck can probably recognize that, if a trucker gets in to an accident, it is going to be a serious affair. Given that trucks are much larger and heavier than most of the vehicles around them, motorists in private passenger cars can quite easily suffer a fatal injury following a truck accident. This is true whether the collision happens on Nevada’s interstates and principal highways and city streets.

According to recent statistics , which date back to 2016, about one-third of all deadly truck crashes can be attributed to what the study refers to as a driver-related factor, that is, some error or omission on the part of the truck driver or other motorist involved in the accident. In all types of fatal crashes, the predominant contributing factor was driving at an excessive speed. However, the second most common driver-related factor varied with whether or not a large commercial vehicle was involved in the accident.

For large trucks, the second most common driver-related factor was inattentiveness. In cases involving family cars and other private vehicles, the second most common factor was impairment, which includes drunk and drugged driving, fatigued driving and even accidents caused by a driver’s physical health.

The inattentiveness category is rather broad and covers a lot more than just texting and driving or talking on a cell phone. Suffice it to say that it is very important that truckers pay full attention to the road at all times. No matter how much of a hurry they may be in, it is also important for them to maintain a safe speed.

Many people in Reno, Nevada, have probably heard at least one warning about the obvious dangers of distracted driving. As smartphones and other technology become more and more prevalent, it has become increasingly important to remind motorists that one can simply not safely multi-task. Dialing or searching the internet for instance, while operating a motor vehicle, is dangerous, period.

However, despite all the warnings, it this country’s distracted driving problem is only getting worse. According to one study , which observed 12,000 drivers, the incidence of drivers using their phones, that is, without a hands-free device, has increased by about 57 percent between 2014 and 2018.

Significantly, this is a time period well after smartphones were a new phenomenon. This means that it seems people are, for a number of reasons, just choosing to ignore the fact that distracted driving is dangerous or are simply willing to assume that risk.

The results of distracted driving, particularly when it involves a cell phone, are often fatal. One government agency dedicated to traffic safety estimates that 3,166 people died in 2017 on this country’s roads, precisely because of distracted driving. As some point out, this number may not even give the full picture of the problem since it does not account for cases in which a driver does not admit to distracted driving, and police do not uncover evidence of such behavior.

In any event, it appears that Nevada drivers, like their counterparts around the country, are not reducing their dangerous driving behaviors. We have a way to go when it comes to avoiding texting and driving, talking on the cell phone and other behavior that can no doubt lead to serious car accidents.